0 views
Natalie Dawson says if you don’t already have at least a million, chasing passive income isn’t the smartest move because your principal is too small to make a real return.
Instead, your most valuable asset is time and she believes you should use it to build, create, and grow until your money can finally work for you.
Do you think this is true for passive income?
#podcast #shorts #money
Get access to exclusive Diary of a CEO content: https://bit.ly/circle-ytshorts
Date: November 12, 2025
Sorry Steven but I won't be watching this one & I love your podcasts. This woman is talking out of her a$* and other people have already described her perfectly. Don't know her background at all but it wasn't by studying medicine or astrophysics.
8% of $60,000 is $4,800. I would LOVE to have an extra $4,800 in my bank account. But realistically, if I make $60k annually, I may only be able to invest $2k initially, and 8% of that is $160. I could see how a millionaire could think $160 ain't shit, but that adds up. Not too mention, if I was to reinvest that money instead of use or save it, each time the return gets bigger (ideally). So, I disagree with this clip – I think it can still be worth it, even if you're initial investment is "small."
my fear is someday she's gonna hit the end of whatever it is she is riding. and that day will be terrible.
I don’t like her, she’s up her own ass
Who let this woman out of the kitchen?
I make 31k a year with 3 days of work a week and I am thankful for that. It's not the highest, but the other time is spent with my family and social circle. All those high numbers getting thrown around baffle me, as if 100k a year is nothing…
Yechhhh totally disagree! Yeah just make 160k instead of 60k.. passive income isn't just interest wtf 😂
Yawn
Imagine being this poor.
$50/ year passive income is way better than winning a $1M lottery ticket