The death of democracy? Why unintelligent protest may wreck society
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https://bigth.ink/Edge
———————————————————————————-
Evolutionary biologist Heather Heying rose to prominence as a member of the Intellectual Dark Web after she and her husband, Professor Bret Weinstein, spoke out against a planned “Day of Absence” at Evergreen State College, where white students, staff and teachers would vacate campus and only minority students would remain. Their opposition to the event led to accusations of racism and a string of protests, threats, and violence, leading The Seattle Times to call the college a “national caricature of intolerant campus liberalism.”
Democracy depends on protest, Heying asserts above, but a new strain of unintelligent protest on the Left may damage the very values liberals are trying to protect. “Increasingly we have groups who are claiming to be emerging from this age-old culture of protest who are actually tamping out dissent, who are saying there are things that cannot be said, there are things that cannot be thought, there are research programs that cannot be done,” she says. “… But they don’t tend to be armed in the way the extreme Right is, and so it’s easy for people to imagine that they’re not as dangerous—but shutting down dissent, shutting down the ability to discuss ideas, is actually the beginning of the death of democracy.”
In this video, Heying looks at tribalism and dissent from an evolutionary perspective, and highlights how technology has hijacked our ancient brain to create a more polarized society than ever before. Follow Heather on twitter: @HeatherEHeying and on Medium and through her website,
heatherheying.com.
———————————————————————————-
HEATHER HEYING:
Heather Heying is an evolutionary biologist and former Professor at Evergreen State College. She applies the tool kit of evolutionary theory to problems large and small, some seemingly intractable, some possibly trivial—what to eat, how to teach and parent and be an upstanding citizen, what to avoid, and what to seek.
Heather came to prominence after she and her husband, Bret Weinstein, stood up to supporters of an enforced “Day of Absence” for white staff and teachers at Evergreen State College.
Follow Heather on twitter: @HeatherEHeying and on Medium and through her website, heatherheying.com.
———————————————————————————-
TRANSCRIPT:
Heather Heying: Society-wide, people are becoming ever more tribal. And tribalism is as old as social groups, which is older than humans. So it’s no surprise that people are looking to find those who sound the most like them, and who they imagine will be the most likely to keep them in their heads when things go wrong. But the way that it’s manifesting is a particularly modern instantiation that I don’t think we’ve seen before.
So protest is old and is honorable and is important; we must be allowed, in any system that calls itself democratic, to dissent. Increasingly, we have groups who are claiming to be emerging from this age-old culture of protest who are actually tamping out dissent, who are saying there are things that cannot be said, there are things that cannot be thought, there are research programs that cannot be done, and that’s dangerous, and it comes from a place of fear, and fear is very powerful evolutionarily. It rises to the top of the emotions when it shows up, and it’s hard to get through the fear with an argument that is rational. Emotion and rationality don’t tend to interface with one another very well, and some of the language that we’re hearing from the extremes on both sides of the political spectrum—I’m not sure that calling it a spectrum is really apt, but everyone is familiar with it.
So the extremes on the right and on the left are both using fear to further polarize people, and the people on the right, the people on the far right, the extremists on the right are both, I think, a smaller group and better armed and thus in some ways more terrifying, but there are so many fewer of them that they don’t seem to have as much voice in society as the growing numbers of extremists on the left who are using words and increasingly, in the case of some of the groups, violent tactics.
But they don’t tend to be armed in the way the extreme right is, and so it’s easy for people to imagine that they’re not as dangerous, but shutting down dissent, shutting down the ability to discuss ideas, is actually the beginning of the death of democracy.
So why does it work? It works because since people have been social, which is to say since be…
For the full transcript, check out https://bigthink.com/videos/heather-heying-why-unintelligent-protest-may-kill-democracy








Want to get Smarter, Faster?
Subscribe for DAILY videos: https://bigth.ink/GetSmarter
Who gives a fuck what a biologist says. She is not an expert on this issue. Lost respect for you big think.
This is not science this is partisan drivel.
Proletariat revolt has always been necessary catalyst for change throughout history.. French revolution, Boston tea party, civil rights etc..
Incredibly relevant right now
Wait I've got something to say. Dunno why people identify with ideology? Neither side defines you. But if I were to choose between Capitalism Vs. Communism, I'd have to lean a bit towards the former.
These idiots don't have any solutions. They just discuss problem and have intellectual sex with each other.
What you call radical left ideas in the USA would be seen as center right in Europe. The problem in the USA is that you have a far right wing political party (Republicans) and a right wing party (Democrats) so anything normal in Europe would seem Radical to you guys.
Hmm. Sounds to me like a conned servant rewrite. The military industrial complex has driven US full speed towards the precipice for 70 years now. Is there really time to draw straws anymore? The GD common humanity is a pile of sh*t .
Major points for putting your own face and voice to so important a message. It's worthy and brave and I appreciate it. Having said that, at what point is it morally excusable to wash your hands of making peace? The Germans of 1920 had just formed a simple political party. They'd later be called Nazis. At what point, as a civilized German, is it okay to permanently distance yourself from that party and its membership? Do we have to wait for killing? Political power grabs? Isn't that too late?
Or do we recognize their openly declared morality (or lack of it) and pull away sooner?
I want peace; badly. I feel the lack of it every moment. But I'll have no peace while political parties or any tribe behaves as the far-Right have in the last five years. My President and his minions have left a stain on democracy that will outlive us all.
Anyone that is Far Right or supports them accepts those moralities actively or passively.
I cannot imagine peace, or the want of it, with anyone who supports that stance.
this channel is what a false partner to the progressive, or any democratic movement, if it ever even claimed to be . By finding blame for people who are reacting to the threat of fascism. People do not know how to respond to what happens when people can be murdered in broad daylight, or when thugs break down your door and shoot you while you sleep, they react. Then you get these elite talking heads coming off with their philosophical arguments about what civilization should be like in the face of difficulties, as if the difficulties we face are no different than ever seen before. A total lack of context being elevated to intellectual sanctimony.